Category: Product design

For the past few weeks, non social-media savvy people (those douche bags, eh?) and even loads of Twitter and Facebook friends of mine have been asking me the same question (not without irritation, mind you)

It’s a difficult one to answer. But if I would like to do so without getting jargon in between, I would say – vanity and social gratifications.

RWW recently did some really cool and detailed thinking on why people are using LBS and here’s the summary of it:

  • Serendipity and Connections
  • For the win
  • As a trvelogue

But I think that the core and basic reason why anyone uses @foursquare is this inbuilt inherent social need of human beings, which require us to proclaim proudly of what we have won in any game. The pride that comes with being popular and cool tech-savvy traveler. The pride of showing prizes and records we have earned in our life. The pride of having our own unique identity (vanity) in this cluttered world. The pride of owning a place, because well if you can’t own it in real life, might as well do it in a virtual world.

And this is social psychology at its basic, which has till now, is currently, and will always remain true till the dusk of time. And it looks as if businesses are starting to make use of this behaviour.

Twitter’s down

Maybe too much of world cup tweets.


so twitter’s got loose motions today, ha?less than a minute ago via web

My online life revolves around Twitter.  I get all my industry information from there. I connect with so many of friends via Twitter.  I connect with other industry professionals on Twitter.  I get my breaking news from there. But what Twitter hadn’t been for me till now is a centralised and organised source of news not unlike a magazine or blog. So, it was a pleasant surprise when I saw the dashboard for the football world cup on Twitter.

First impression: Looks slick. Very clean UI as usual. Woohooo!

On deeper testing: I can only think of one thing. What am I supposed to do now?

It does not solve any purpose for me. The tweets that are whooshing past in the activity stream are either very irrelevant or they move past too fast. How are they selected? On the basis of most no. of RTs? Or most no. of followers of the original source?

Well, whatever it is, it is clearly failing. There are some tweets which are not about the world cup and some which are not in English (how hard can transliteration be, man?) :

A decent feature seems to be the Top Staff Picks which is a collection of the best Twitter handles (experts and players) on the topic.

The individual page for each page sounded promising but turned out to be a bigger disappointment, full of bots, hashtags and random information.

What is happening here?

The current model is way too reliant on trusting individual users and then streaming their tweets to the visitors. What Twitter needs here is a better search based UI which is good in its algorithms and measures influence properly.

Otherwise, I am afraid Twitter will always be what it is in this dashboard: Noise.

Anandan Pillai, a PhD student at MDI, Gurgaon and a Summer Research Fellow at Superchooha writes on his blog about the new introduction of ‘Like’ buttons by Facebook. leaving behind the ‘Become a fan’ tag.

And he talks about it from a perspective that most of us didn’t see – from a brand’s point of view. And he makes some solid arguments to prove his proposals right.

However, what surprised me was the context of argument, almost everyone argued from the perspective of individual users (read “customers” if you are marketer). Now, this took me aback!!!

I feel, when someone says “I like this”, it doesn’t make bring a kick in me, because I feel ya you might me 1 of other billion odd people who might be liking this. On the contrary, when you say me “I am a fan of Facebook”, this ushers the adrenaline in me and makes my stupid brain think, why the hell this person is fan of some strange animal called “facebook”, what’s so special about it?, and this curiosity leads to search for information about “facebook” (which means receiving new unique visitors), getting acclimatized with it (increasing chances of conversion), and maybe becoming a fan of it too (yeahh that’s my target at the end of the day). Does it sound good (if not great)???? Hit me back if any marketer disagrees to it.

I personally think it was a good move for businesses everywhere, maybe not from a marketing point of view because Facebook definitely wants to expand the radius of its social graph, unless it suffers the fate of Friendster and MySpace. To do that, Facebook needs to become the ubiquitous social identity. The de facto. The omnipresent. Now to do that Facebook needs to enter websites and every online operations. And by killing the more passionate word called ‘fan’ Facebook enters a more neutral ground of ‘liking’ which everyone can live with. And doesn’t mind indulging in.

I can just be interested in something and I can like it. Thus putting it into my social stream and exposing the ‘liked’ content to my friends thus making it go viral. More likes >> More content into social streams >> More hits back to website >> Facebook = happy and Content owner = Happy!

And I have seen this again and again. Brand managers get so fascinated by the phrase ‘My brand has x000 fans on Facebook’ that they start forgetting the real value of the word ‘fan’ .. A fan is a wildly passionate evangelist of your brand who loves it. Revels in it. And tells others proudly about his fandom.

How many fans of a page are actually at that stage? Doesn’t it conclude that most of them just liked your brand anyways and were NOT fans.

Just read a fun to read post from Amit Klein, Product Manager at Directi.com where he proposes a product idea calling it Sign.al. Do read the post and give the credits to him in the comments. What I’m gonna do here is take down his points and edit / delete / remove them to add my two cents. And yes, this is a call for open research! So if anyone reading this would like to do the same to my post please go ahead. I am sure such product ideas are already in the pipeline at loads of places. I would like someone to add to the shortcomings and challenges. Oh and of course I know that building this product is a dream … but I seem to be having fun thinking about it!

First things first, that’s a killer domain name dude! Read on for more; the text in italics and red is original content from Amit:

We are overloaded with information. During the course of my day I email, tweet, comment, post, chat, message, buzz, check -n, call, SMS, MMS, BBM and sometimes (if I’m really lucky) actually talk to people. We are moving towards an ever increasing flood of content (much of it automated) and it’s only gettin’ worse. One day soon everything will tweet.

Some of the steps from my side that I have taken to curb this overload is move away from email for managing tasks, follow only 50 people on Twitter and *cough* say no to Google Buzz. But still I do invariably feel the need for a single platform which syncs all these media platforms and lets me manage all contacts, conversations and content from one central dashboard.


It’s not the the sheer quantity of information that’s the problem (faster flow of information will only help people achieve more), it’s how we send and receive it:

  • Sending: How do I send out information so that it reaches it’s intended audience only. In the upcoming era of persistent, public online identity, how do I can still share my green-beer, toga party pictures with my friends and make sure potential clients don’t see it? Additionally, I want to publicize my boring social media posts without spamming my friends who I know really, really don’t care.
    Very well put. I feel that media platforms have already taken the first steps by giving us more deeper control to our content updates e.g. Facebook now allows very customised privacy control on every status update. But these are just the first steps.
  • Receiving: With all this content around how do I make sure that that important stuff gets to me FAST, while the stuff that matters stays buried (until I get really bored or have lots of time to look through it).
    Once again, I can add nothing to the insight apart from the fact that we ave already taken the first steps e.g. Twitter now allows us to create lists which works out brilliantly.

The idea that’s been bouncin’ around my head tries to address the second point… enter: sign.al.

I have a dream… that one day my phone will ring when my buddy is callin’ me up to go grab a beer, while calls from vodafone bill collectors stay silent. That my blackberry will only flash in meetings only when really really important stuff happens (like the Mets scoring a winning run). That one day, we’ll be able to ignore the tens, hundereds or thousands of messages that don’t matter, and focus our attentions on the ones that do. Here’s how sign.al would work. Let us divide it into steps / interactions:

1st step: Initialising

  • You give it all your account information (Gmail, Facebook, Twitter etc)
  • It starts off like any aggregator (Seesmic for instance), showing you a timeline of emails, Facebook messages, Tweets, yadda yadda.

2nd step: Learn a user’s interactions preferences

  • Aright, now’s where it starts getting cool… after a little while, it moves away from a Timeline view, to a priority view. It starts guessing knowing what you are most likely gonna want to read and respond to and starts moving those to the top. This shift is already happening (FB news feed vs time line, Mozilla Raindrop, Xobni for Blackberry) Also Feedly for smart news aggregation and Hakia for semantic search. Have a look at how the semantic web is evolving here.
  • Sign.al can know what’s important by:
    • Frequency – How regularly you read and respond to individuals
    • Speed – Of your read/response
    • Popularity – The number of comments, RTs, likes, and mentions
    • Proximity – Number of shared connections
    • Medium – @mentions more weightage then email cc’s?
    • Geo-location – Are messages from Mumbai and NYC more important to me?
    • Time of day – Are certain types of messages more important at a certain time?
    • Content – Am I more likely to be interested in content about the Jets regardless of where, when, how it’s getting to me? (yes)
    • Recency – Moving away from this but still a factor
    • Top readers – Who are your biggest fans? Who reads your content very regularly? Everyone likes a bit of vanity :)
    • Friends of friends – Information networks like Twitter are inherently build to propogate and open up new relationships. Can I have an option to open up a new layer of 2nd degree connections?
    • Type of connections – Do I want people I know only on micro-blogs? Or maybe I just want a good old list of friends on phone? BTW the new Nokia phones on the open source Maemo OS are doing this pretty well, also Windows 7 phones are good in syncing social contacts across various platforms. But they still lag seamless engagement models.
  • Phase 2 – Phone app
    • Incorporating voice and SMS into the mix of content to prioritize
    • Different types of notifications instead of timeline: ring for an important sms, vibrate for a somewhat important @mention, silent for a newsletter.

I personally think Phase 2 needs to be released with the Phase 1 itself, but then again he’s the Product Development expert and not me!

  • Phase 3 – Setting status (implicitly?) in a meeting, driving, out to lunch – reduce/amplify notification methods. If I’m sitting at the airport bored and normally my phone vibrates for an important tweet, now ring.

A very interesting functionality. i doubt if we yet have good enough Artificial Intelligence to classify my state of activity by reading the sentiments in my status updates. Maybe some kinda categorising / rating system?

  • Phase 4 – Anticipate – Based on where I am, the type of message, who I’m connecting with, the medium, the format etc… start anticipating how I may respond to them (in a totally not creepy big brotherish way)

Totally against this one. I need to have a personal touch to my central communications console.

Ideas are a dime a dozen, execution’s what matters. Take this idea, build it, I’ll use it and be happy (just be forewarned you need to legal operations in Albania to actually register the sign.al domain name :P )

Amen! Any takers to take this forward?

The ‘real’ real time web

This recent article by the talented Daniel Tenner (CTO at Woobius) got me all charged up, sometimes shaking my head at the writer and sometimes nodding in agreement. Here’s what I think of the real time web Mr. Daniel; challenges, pros and cons all wrapped up in one:

Definition

A fundamental shift in the way information is spread and shared on the internet. But as Mr. Daniel says – “At its core, the concept of “real-time web” must be about the immediacy of information flow” Well put, Sir!

Why do we need it?

Human beings are an impatient species. And as the reference article says everyone has 24 hours, no less no more. All the more reason for us being impatient, right? Personally, I want to grab every piece of information, as soon as I can, before everyone else.

Some important things to be noticed here are that I would like the information to be relevant to me interest, it shouldn’t interfere with my daily work and I should be able to quickly assimilate the whole story from snippets of real time data flowing around me.

Push or pull?

The most important point that Mr. Daniel stresses is the fact that real time web is forcing info on users and thus interrupting productivity. What is being forgotten while making this remark is the fact that the 2.0 web and all its real time characteristics with it (web 3.0?) are permission based ones. No one pushes the information on to the audience in the new media, the audience goes to the information portals and seek it out themselves.

Challenges

The challenge of mining real time data and converting it into meaningful information will be the breakthrough of the century. And we are slowly moving towards that goal, one step at a time.